Does Pursuing Our Passions Mean We Are in Crisis? It seems in life whenever we decide to actively pursue our dreams or child-like passions, we are labeled as having a crisis.
A mid-life crisis, an existential crisis, a post divorce crisis, postpartum crisis.
Why is this? Is it because going for what we love threatens other people?
Or is it because it takes a crisis to wake us up to how we are living in complacency. From there, we can begin to move forward and live authentically?
I would love to know your thoughts as I ponder a newsletter post on this topic.
authentic expression. hello, i'm glad to be here. i'd like to know what is important and meaningful to the people reading this, and so that would start with me going first.
i did an exercise to uncover my authentic code, four words that capture my core values and soul essence: creativity, connection, freedom, growth.
my theme for this year is sovereignty, which to me is about self-authorship and responsibility and empowerment. i feel like a deeply rooted tree at times. there's a certainty that no matter what is happening externally, i am okay. "the world can do what it want, whenever it want, i don't mind." during a call with a friend today about sovereignty, a desire for ease came up. ease is present when i can flow along with whatever life is asking of me.
i've been devouring books by wayne dyer. his ideas are profound and simple. while listening to one of his books i understood how much authority i have over all of my habits, actions, words, and even my thoughts. i can give more attention to whatever serves me and discard whatever does not. i can change the action or let the thought pass.
i'm currently reading the untethered soul by michael singer. from this book i love the idea of the witness, an aware presence underneath all of my other human stuff, all of my experiences and emotions and thoughts. the idea of two or more witnesses all seeing each other and connecting on that level is deeply moving to me.
health and fitness are important to me. last fall i did a program with a lot of intense yang energy called 75 hard, and i've incorporated many of its lessons and habits into more relaxed and sustainable rhythms that work for me. i jokingly call it 75% hard :^)
i'm very online. i love to make things and share them with whoever will lend me their attention. i tend to be scattered creatively so i've chosen to focus on making a word puzzle game called word sleuth - i finished the prototype this week. many of the other things i've made are available via my website.
Trust involves curiosity more than certainty: . This kind of related to my post about the cosmos being more a communion of subjects than a collection of objects.
I mentioned in another post that I’m working with the Art of Alignment (AoA) team in Boulder. This morning it occurred to me just how vital curiosity is to authentic TRUST in all caps, and almost completely missing from the outrage fueled simulacra of trust that is driving almost all media these days, social, mainstream, etc.
I was also reflecting on a business coach who was sick and tired of hearing:
And I agree, just as TRUST isn’t just a decision or a feeling (more like an embodied engagement), ALIGNMENT isn’t just about Let’s just get aligned everyone!
agreeing to agree.
Ultimately, it’s not really the people who are getting aligned. It is the contextual frames that align, allowing individuals to cohere into a more viable and complexly alive we-self.
There is a weird social geometry
or topology
that has us basically sweep our concerns and criticisms under the rug if we desire to be aligned with someone, and only bring these concerns out when they are so strong that they can’t be suppressed, and then they come out with a conflictual energy that can trigger a defensive reaction.
In the AoA process, after hearing a proposal (soft, like clay that hasn’t been glazed and fired yet), before we take a hammer to it, we are invited to bring our curiosity in the form of clarifying questions. Get to know what this proposal entails. With curiosity established in a group setting, appreciative inquiry can proceed with complimenting the things I hadn’t seen from my previous fixed viewpoint. Now when I bring my concerns, they aren’t so sharp (don’t feel like criticisms), and can be included in the mix. Next, changes are proposed and considered from a space of openness and cooperative synergy. Finally, from this place of deep collaboration, with all hands having input, there is a request for soft commitment: We’re going to take all of the interaction today into consideration and rework the proposal, and share our update in a similar open form. If we address found issues to your satisfaction when we come back, how committed are you to working on the implementation of this proposal.
What are your secret internal moves, your cues? I'm eternally curious about how we navigate our worlds, and the tricks, jumps, hops, and skips we use.
Sports coaches have cues for all kinds of things. "Follow through" in golf, tennis, and throwing generally. "Chest up, hips back, knees out" for a back squat. "Light feet" or "quick feet" for agility training.
These cues aren't attempting to be accurate descriptions of the world from a physics point of view. They're an attitude/orientation that helps a human do a thing a little better.
My contention: we each are an entire compendium of little skill orientations that we use all the time. But because they're second nature and interior, they're funcionally invisible and don't often get shared or talked about.
Wouldn't it be neat if we talked about them?
Some examples from me:
So what are your cues? Nothing is too simple, silly, or obvious.
When you take one path. When you take one path, all other paths die and are left behind.
Such is the weight of all our choices.
But I'm not good at letting things die. I keep going back and dragging half-alive corpses around. Abomination!
You stink of the dead. Mark your endings and grieve them, foul beast!
My vision of a better future is simple: we've learned to see how much energy we spend maintaining rather than living. Maintaining our anger. Maintaining our fears. Maintaining our stories about why we can't be happy right now.
We discover we are the ones keeping our emotional states alive through constant effort. Like tightening a fist so long we forgot we were doing it.
We can see the holding mechanism itself.
We catch ourselves ruminating over old grievances to keep anger alive, scanning for threats to maintain anxiety, repeating limiting stories to preserve familiar identities, even grasping at pleasant feelings which paradoxically pushes away natural joy.
In this future, everyone knows - even kids are taught from a small age - that any feeling beyond 90 seconds is a state of our own holding onto (credit to Jill Bolte Taylor).
When everyone knows this, we can have a different kind of inquiry.
We see that emotions aren't lingering on their own. Instead, they're house guests we kept inviting back by setting a place at the table.
#FutureYouLove
There are extra line breaks in this post for some reason. It's either one blig block of text or this. IDK how to remove them.
On Aspiration. In a recent Relateful Flow session, I said that I was aspiring toward something and that, to me, aspiration is an active principle. My comment was met with strong disagreement from a person who said that aspiration is passive and only concrete action of a physical kind, actually "doing" something, is active. I was a bit shocked and then realized that I might be in the minority on this subject. To me, "aspiring" is actively signaling Life/God that I am now ready and willing to receive the thing I have been saying I wanted. It is an energetic "yes"! Other more physically tangible actions may follow, but aspiration is first , especially in things which have always seemed to be beyond my grasp.
However, I understand what the person was pointing to. There is a world where action is physical; aspiring may be useful in some way, but it is a passive practice.
Would love others' thoughts and experience with this.
I don’t know if I am doing this right. . I had the urge in my car to start singing an improvised song (inspired by my relateful camp experience at Annabeth’s Vocal Flow and Kedar’s bonfire jam) and it was in that exploration that I had the epiphany that I am allowed to write bad poems! This really excites me and now I’ve started to write a bunch of things that I feel poetic about. The permission to be bad has been crucial in my permission to try, and now I am wanting to maintain my permission to be bad and try in front of others.
I haven’t posted on UpTrust because I question whether or not I am really “trustable” on any topic. I don’t feel qualified, or justified, or certifiably “trustable”, apart from maybe my honest attempts at honesty. But my honesty =/= truth. I could speak honestly about what I think a Beef Wellington is and still be wrong.
But I can write bad poems, and I can be wrong, AND I can do that publicly. And in doing it publicly, maybe my poems become better and my honesty becomes truer.
I don’t know if I am doing this right. . I had the urge in my car to start singing an improvised song (inspired by my relateful camp experience at Annabeth’s Vocal Flow and Kedar’s bonfire jam) and it was in that exploration that I had the epiphany that I am allowed to write bad poems! This really excites me and now I’ve started to write a bunch of things that I feel poetic about. The permission to be bad has been crucial in my permission to try, and now I am wanting to maintain my permission to be bad and try in front of others.
I haven’t posted on UpTrust because I question whether or not I am really “trustable” on any topic. I don’t feel qualified, or justified, or certifiably “trustable”, apart from maybe my honest attempts at honesty. But my honesty =/= truth. I could speak honestly about what I think a Beef Wellington is and still be wrong.
But I can write bad poems, and I can be wrong, AND I can do that publicly. And in doing it publicly, maybe my poems become better and my honesty becomes truer.
A big element of fictional power fantasies is having a clear and compelling identity and taking direct action toward goals. This explains why many evil characters are loved even though they are emotionally dysfunctional mob bosses with a terrible home life, or bitter, pathetic, terminal cancer patients. Tony Soprano and Walter White have clear and present goals that they move continuously toward without self doubt. That’s the real fantasy, more than the “power” they have. #deeptakes